THE PRESENT STUDY WAS CONDUCTED WITH THE AIM OF COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE TWO International CourtS OF Justice AND THE International CRIMINAL Court AND THEIR POSITION IN THE International SYSTEM. THE RESEARCH METHOD IS OF THEORETICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE-ANALYTICAL TYPE. THE COMPILATION OF MATERIALS BASED ON LIBRARY STUDIES RESULTED IN THE FOLLOWING RESULT: CourtS AND TRIALS IN THE International ARENA NOT ONLY ARE AT THE STAGE OF CREATION, BUT AT THE STAGE OF FORMATION, ARE OWED ENTIRELY TO THE INTEREST OF THE STATE, SO THAT GOVERNMENTS AND RULERS DO NOT CONSENT TO THE POSSIBILITY JURISDICTION AND JURISDICTION. OF COURSE, THE DEVELOPMENT OF International ORGANIZATIONS AND, ABOVE ALL, THE UNITED NATIONS AND THE RESTRICTION OF THE COUNTRY BY International ORGANIZATIONS AND THE ACCEPTANCE OF MEMBERSHIP RESTRICTIONS, ALL REPRESENT THE POSSIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING SUCH AN International ORGANIZATION DESPITE THE RELUCTANCE OF THE COUNTRIES. WITH THIS IN MIND, THE International Court OF Justice, KNOWN AS THE International Court OF Justice, IS THE MAIN JUDICIAL BODY OF THE UNITED NATIONS, HEADQUARTERED AT THE PEACE PALACE IN THE HAGUE, NETHERLANDS. REFERRING TO LEGAL DISPUTES BETWEEN COUNTRIES IS REFERRED TO THE Court, AS WELL AS PROVIDING ADVISORY OPINIONS IN RESPONSE TO LEGAL QUESTIONS OF International ORGANIZATIONS, SPECIALIZED AGENCIES OF THE UNITED NATIONS AND THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE UNITED NATIONS ARE THE MAIN DUTIES OF THE Court. THE International CRIMINAL Court, THE FIRST PERMANENT International TRIBUNAL TO INVESTIGATE GENOCIDAL CRIMES, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, WAR CRIMES AND RAPE (THE STATUTE OF THE TRIBUNAL HAS PROVIDED FOR THREE PRIMARY OFFENSES, BUT HAS NOT AGREED ON TERRITORIAL AGGRESSION), WHICH IS BASED IN THE HAGUE, NETHERLANDS.